We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

Borec 0 - 4 Aleva u

4435 spectators had come to The Sun this cloudy day. was the appointed referee with assistance provided by and . Borec started off with a 4-4-2 lineup. They fielded: Chadikoski - Tavares, Nelies, Steg, Aliukaj - Panajotov, Aceski, Pachkov, Tasevski - Lozanovski, Kuźniar.

Aleva u tactics involved an interesting 5-4-1 combination. Lineup: Torroni - 宇文 (Yuwen), Jariff, Haubert, Brzeszcz, Sipos - Axford, Kejha, Bren, 凱軍 (Kaijun) - Čubela.

For their match strategy, Aleva u had decided to use their extra-terrestrial ability to counter-attack whenever possible. Shaun Axford came close to putting the visiting team one up 11 minutes into the match, following a solo raid down the middle, but Veljo Chadikoski managed to tip the ball to a corner. Aleva u were given a free kick 18 minutes into the game, just after a swift counter attack broke down. Rather than shooting straight at goal, it was directed at the area just in front of the keeper. The attackers made several runs and made it hard for the defenders to protect their goal. After a short tussle with a defender, Shaun Axford could finally lay the ball to rest behind the keeper. 0 - 1, and prove it can pay off to come prepared. 20 minutes into the game, Borec seemed to suffer a certain amount of confusion and they fell to a solid level of organisation. With 29 minutes played, a quick exchange of passes on the left wing freed Przemysław Brzeszcz of Aleva u to slip through the defence and score another goal for the visitors. That made the score 0 - 2. A defender managed to keep the ball from crossing the goal-line after a curling shot coming in from the right from Shaun Axford after 34 minutes, and prevented Aleva u from going up another goal. 0 - 2 was the halftime score. Borec had most of the ball, with 51 percent of possession.

Despite his frustration resulting in the smashing of a few teacups, the coach of Borec was able to get his message across, and raised Borec's organisation to excellent. Some fine movement on the left led to a Aleva u goal after 50 minutes, making it 0 - 3. Draženko Čubela was noted down as the scorer. The players of Aleva u now seemed to think the job was done and acted more defensively, just waiting for the ref to blow the final whistle. Draženko Čubela left the field with a smile on his face as he was substituted 57 minutes into the game, as his team was in the lead. 劉 (Lau) 佑星 (Youxing) was the replacement. The Aleva u players could smell victory in the air. Shaun Axford wasn't in a hurry to leave the field as he was substituted for 何 (Ho) 康彪 (Kangbiao) after 70 minutes. 吴 (Wu) 宇文 (Yuwen) wanted to play on, but the Aleva u coach had other ideas, and he was replaced 73 minutes into the game by 梁 (Liang) 曉誠 (Xiaocheng). Jiří Kejha became the new Aleva u captain. 80 minutes into the game, Borec had difficulty finding their positions and their organisation dropped to passable. 劉 (Lau) 佑星 (Youxing) could have put his team up another goal 86 minutes into the game, after a rush down the left, but his closing shot hit the post. With 88 minutes played, Aleva u's well-worked indirect free kick caused havoc in the penalty area, and when the ball eventually fell to Cornelius Haubert he gleefully slotted the ball home to make it 0 - 4. Afonso Tavares of Borec received a yellow card after 89 minutes for unsportsmanlike behaviour. Aleva u enjoyed most of the ball, as they maintained 53 percent of possession.

Most important Borec player was Bogusław Kuźniar. Kuno Nelies on the other hand, had a terrible day. Aleva u's top performer was clearly Izzeddine Jariff. 何 (Ho) 康彪 (Kangbiao) turned in a dismal performance, however. The match ends 0 - 4.

Rating details

Midfield weak (high) weak (low) 15 14 4/20 4/20
Right defence passable (very low) extra-terrestrial (very low) 21 61 6/20 16/20
Central defence passable (high) divine (+2) (very low) 23 85 6/20 22/20
Left defence inadequate (very high) titanic (very high) 20 60 5/20 15/20
Right attack weak (high) inadequate (very high) 15 20 4/20 5/20
Central attack excellent (very high) poor (low) 32 10 8/20 3/20
Left attack formidable (very low) weak (very high) 33 16 9/20 4/20
Indirect set pieces
Defence inadequate (low) excellent (high) 18 31 5/20 8/20
Attack weak (very high) passable (high) 16 23 4/20 6/20
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Counter-attacks
Tactic skill (no tactic) extra-terrestrial (no tactic) 16 16/20



Chance distribution

Home Away
4 8

1 Left attack 3
1 Central attack 2
2 Right attack 1
0 Other 2
0 Special events 0
Detailed match analysis is not available for matches more than two seasons old.

Rating details

Please note that the percentages above are meant to guide you, but they do not equate to the exact probabilities (to score for example) used in the match engine.

Indirect set pieces

Defence inadequate (low) excellent (high) 18 31 5/20 8/20
Attack weak (very high) passable (high) 16 23 4/20 6/20


Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Normal Counter-attacks
Tactic skill (no tactic) extra-terrestrial (no tactic) 16 16/20

Average ratings

Total player experience weak (very low) inadequate (very low) 13 17 4/20 5/20
Average midfield weak (high) weak (low) 15 14 4/20 4/20
Average defence passable (very low) magical (very low) 21 69 6/20 18/20
Average attack solid (high) weak (very high) 27 16 7/20 4/20
Total average passable (very low) formidable (very low) 21 33 6/20 9/20


Rate this page